Measuring Electromagnetic Impact on Living Systems
Biophotons as Biomarkers
Engineers measure electromagnetic fields with precision. Frequencies, power densities, modulation patterns. The data fills regulatory reports and safety assessments. But these measurements tell us nothing about what happens inside a living cell.
Biology doesn’t register in watts per square meter. It registers in disrupted coherence, scrambled signals, broken information transfer. We’ve been measuring the wrong thing.
The gap between field strength and biological damage has paralyzed EMF policy for decades. Industry points to thermal thresholds. Scientists show non-thermal effects. Regulators wait for certainty that never comes. People get sick without acknowledged cause.
Biophotons end this stalemate.
Light From Living Tissue
Every organism emits ultra-weak photons. This isn’t theory. It’s measurable physics. Between 200 and 800 nanometers. Intensities so low they require specialized detection. The light comes from DNA, reflects cellular state, changes with stress and damage.
Fritz-Albert Popp proved these emissions are coherent. Organized. Information-carrying. Healthy cells maintain tight coherence patterns. Disease breaks those patterns. Cancer shows complete disorganization.
Konstantin Korotkov built technology that captures this light from fingertips and maps it to organ systems. Russian medicine uses it clinically. Over a million people measured.
Beverly Rubik established the framework: biological regulation happens through electromagnetic fields. Her NIH research measured how these fields respond to stress, intention, environmental factors. The patterns shift before blood chemistry changes. Before symptoms emerge.
The critical insight: Electromagnetic pollution will disrupt biophoton coherence before any other biomarker catches it. Before conventional medicine sees damage. Before epidemiology can establish causation. Before people understand why they feel wrong.
What Science Already Knows
Alexander Gurwitsch discovered mitogenetic rays in 1923. Onion roots emitting ultraviolet light that stimulated cell division in neighboring roots. The phenomenon generated over 1,000 publications before World War II disrupted the research. Then decades of silence.
The 1970s brought modern photon detection equipment. Popp and colleagues in Germany, Inaba’s team in Japan, Voeikov’s group in Russia. Independent laboratories confirming the same basic facts:
All living cells emit continuous low-level photons
Emission patterns encode physiological state
DNA stores and releases these photons
The light is coherent, organized, information-rich
Health and disease show completely different signatures
Rahnama and Tuszynski’s theoretical work connected biophotons to neural function. Mitochondrial emissions interact with microtubules. The fluctuations correlate with EEG patterns. Brain activity has a photonic dimension we’ve barely begun to explore.
The cucumber studies by Kokubo and Yamamoto identified specific mechanisms. Oxidative stress increases emission. Reactive oxygen species generate excited states that decay photonically. Enzymatic reactions produce characteristic spectral signatures. You can measure healing effects, stress responses, toxic exposures by tracking these patterns.
Pagliaro’s recent work with 311 subjects found correlations between emission consistency and psychological state. Anger and mood disturbance show up in the biophoton field. Mind and light are linked at measurable levels.
Measuring What Matters
We know electromagnetic fields interact with biological systems. The question has always been: how do we measure meaningful biological response rather than just tissue heating?
Biophotons give us the answer. Coherence patterns. If environmental EMF disrupts the body’s native electromagnetic organization, that disruption should appear as:
- Changes in emission intensity
- Altered spectral distribution
- Loss of temporal coherence
- Shifts in spatial patterns
- Modified response to standard challenges
Popp showed this decades ago with different frequencies of light exposure. The delayed luminescence response changed. The coherence properties shifted. The information content transformed.
Nobody has systematically applied this methodology to modern electromagnetic pollution. Not to WiFi. Not to 5G. Not to the cumulative exposure we all swim through constantly. Not with the precision instruments now available.
EFEIA Research Initiative
We propose systematic investigation of electromagnetic field effects using biophoton emission as the primary biological endpoint. Three research tracks:
1.
Establish Baseline
Map normal biophoton signatures across populations, ages, health states. Build reference databases. Quantify individual variation. Define healthy coherence across demographics. Deploy both GDV technology and photomultiplier systems. Create the normative data that doesn’t exist yet.
2.
Controlled Exposure
Systematic testing of various frequencies, intensities, modulation schemes. Measure acute biophoton response. Track recovery periods. Identify vulnerable subgroups. Compare exposure scenarios: continuous versus pulsed, near-field versus far-field, single versus multiple frequencies. Document dose-response curves nobody has established.
3.
Field Correlation
Link measured EMF in homes, schools, workplaces to individual biophoton patterns. Epidemiological investigation of coherence disruption in high-exposure populations. Longitudinal tracking as environments change. Validation of laboratory findings in real life.
Technical Methods
Gas Discharge Visualization
Fast, non-invasive, clinically validated. Fingertip emissions mapped to meridian and organ systems. Suitable for mass screening and individual monitoring over time.
Direct Photon Counting
Photomultiplier tubes measuring skin, forehead, hands. Higher sensitivity, spectral resolution. Better for mechanistic research and method validation.
Spectroscopic Analysis
Wavelength-specific measurement identifies emission sources. Different molecular excited states produce different colors. This distinguishes signal from background, biological from instrumental artifact.
Temporal Analysis
Coherence requires time-domain measurement. Delayed luminescence kinetics. Photon arrival time statistics. Cross-correlation between body regions. Pattern recognition in supposedly random noise.
Integration with Standard Biomarkers
Blood work, hormones, oxidative stress, DNA damage. Biophotons shouldn’t replace conventional medicine. They should show what happens before those tests turn positive.
We Need Collaborators
This research requires expertise spanning physics, biology, medicine, engineering, statistics. We seek partnerships with:
- Academic Research Groups: University laboratories with photon detection equipment, EMF exposure facilities, human subjects protocols. Shared access to instrumentation, student researchers, publication infrastructure.
- Medical Institutions: Clinical validation, patient populations, longitudinal health data. Hospitals using GDV diagnostically can contribute baseline measurements and outcome tracking.
- Technology Developers: Improved detection systems, portable monitoring devices, data analysis algorithms. Commercial potential exists for validated biofield assessment tools.
- Public Health Organizations: Translation to policy recommendations, exposure guidelines, protective strategies. Scientific evidence means nothing without implementation pathways.
- Citizen Science Networks: Self-quantifiers, electromagnetic hypersensitivity support groups, wellness communities. Large-scale data collection, real-world exposure scenarios, motivated participants.
- Funding Partners: Government health agencies, private foundations, environmental organizations. Multi-year commitment needed for meaningful results.
What Success Looks Like?
Five years from now, biophoton measurement becomes standard methodology in EMF research. Regulatory agencies request coherence data alongside SAR values. Technology companies design products with consideration for biofield impact. Clinicians can assess individual electromagnetic sensitivity objectively rather than dismissively.
Ten years from now, we understand which exposure patterns matter biologically and which don’t. Protection strategies target actual mechanisms rather than precautionary guesswork. Architecture and urban planning incorporate electromagnetic hygiene alongside acoustics and air quality.
Twenty years from now, the debate has moved past “does EMF affect biology?” to “how do we optimize electromagnetic environments for health?” Medicine recognizes light-based signaling as fundamental to physiology. Diagnosis includes biofield assessment routinely.
Join this Project
EFEIA invites researchers, institutions, and organizations to participate in this initiative.
The science exists. The technology exists. The need is urgent. What’s missing is coordinated effort.
Contact EFEIA to discuss collaboration models, research proposals, funding mechanisms, and implementation pathways. Together we can establish biophotons as the definitive biomarker for electromagnetic impact on living systems.
Scientific Reference Library
- Bajpai, R. P. (1998). Coherent nature of biophotons: Experimental evidence and phenomenological model. In J. J. Chang, J. Fisch, & F. A. Popp (Eds.), Biophotons (pp. 323–339). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0928-6_21
- Beloussov, L. V., & Voeikov, V. L. (2007). From mitogenetic rays to biophotons. In L. Beloussov, V. Voeikov, & V. Martiniuk (Eds.), Biophotonics and coherent systems in biology (pp. 1–16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-28417-0_1
- Bischof, M., & Del Giudice, E. (2013). Communication and the emergence of collective behavior in living organisms: A quantum approach. Molecular Biology International, 2013, 987549. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/987549
- Boudet, A. (2011). L’ADN électromagnétique et la communication entre cellules. Spirit-Science.fr. https://www.spirit-science.fr/doc_humain/ADN6photons.html
- Calcerrada, M., & García-Ruiz, C. (2019). Human ultraweak photon emission: Key analytical aspects, results and future trends—A review. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 49(4), 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2018.1534199
- Cifra, M., & Pospíšil, P. (2014). Ultra-weak photon emission from biological samples: Definition, mechanisms, properties, detection and applications. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 139, 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.02.009
- Cohen, S., & Popp, F. A. (1997). Biophoton emission of the human body. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 40(2), 187–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1011-1344(97)00050-X
- Cohen, S., & Popp, F. A. (2003). Biophoton emission of human body. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 41(5), 440–445. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15244265/
- Cohen, S., & Popp, F. A. (1998). Whole-body counting of biophotons and its relation to biological rhythms. In J. J. Chang, J. Fisch, & F. A. Popp (Eds.), Biophotons (pp. 183–190). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0928-6_13
- Dotta, B. T., Buckner, C. A., Cameron, D., Lafrenie, R. F., & Persinger, M. A. (2011). Biophoton emissions from cell cultures: Biochemical evidence for the plasma membrane as the primary source. General Physiology and Biophysics, 30(3), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.4149/gpb_2011_03_301
- Gu, Q. (1998). Biophotons and nonclassical light. In J. J. Chang, J. Fisch, & F. A. Popp (Eds.), Biophotons (pp. 297–322). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0928-6_20
- Kobayashi, M., Kikuchi, D., & Okamura, H. (2009). Imaging of ultraweak spontaneous photon emission from human body displaying diurnal rhythm. PLOS ONE, 4(7), e6256. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006256
- Kokubo, H., & Yamamoto, M. (2008). Research on emission mechanisms of biophotons from cucumber. Journal of the International Society of Life Information Science, 26(1), 53–58. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/islis/26/1/26_1_53/_article
- Korotkov, K. G. (2002). Human energy field study with GDV bioelectrography. Backbone Publishing. https://www.amazon.com/Human-Energy-Field-Study-Bioelectrography/dp/096443119X
- Korotkov, K. G., Matravers, P., Orlov, D. V., & Williams, B. O. (2010). Application of electrophoton capture (EPC) analysis based on gas discharge visualization (GDV) technique in medicine: A systematic review. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 16(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2008.0285
- Montagnier, L., Aïssa, J., Ferris, S., Montagnier, J. L., & Lavallee, C. (2009). Electromagnetic signals are produced by aqueous nanostructures derived from bacterial DNA sequences. Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, 1(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12539-009-0036-7
- Movaffaghi, Z., & Farsi, M. (2009). Biofield therapies: Biophysical basis and biological regulations? Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 15(1), 35–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2008.07.002
- Niggli, H. J. (2003). Temperature dependence of ultraweak photon emission in fibroblastic differentiation after irradiation with artificial sunlight. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 41(5), 419–423. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15244263/
- Pagliaro, G., Gullà, D., Simonetti, G., Stivanello, E., Pandolfi, P., Musti, M., De Lisio, S., Ventura, C., & Tressoldi, P. (2024). Photon emission of the human body (biophotons) and perceived well-being. Journal of Quantum Science of Consciousness, 1(2), 1–9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378151785
- Pagliaro, G., Mandolesi, N., Pareni, G., Marconi, L., Galli, M., Sireci, F., & Agostini, E. (2017). Human bio-photons emission: An observational case study of emission of energy using a Tibetan meditative practice on an individual. BAOJ Physics, 2(4), 025. https://emmind.net/openpapers_repos/Endogenous_Fields-Mind/Endo._Biophotons/Biophotons_Various/2017_Human_Bio-Photons_Emission_an_observational_Case_Study_of_Emission_of_Energy_Using_a_Tibetan_Meditative_Practice_on_an_Individual.pdf
- Popp, F. A. (1976). Biophotonen: Ein neuer Weg zur Lösung des Krebsproblems. Verlag für Medizin Dr. Ewald Fischer.
- Popp, F. A. (2003). Properties of biophotons and their theoretical implications. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 41(5), 391–402. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15244259/
- Popp, F. A. (2003). Biophotons—Background, experimental results, theoretical approach and applications. In F. A. Popp & L. Beloussov (Eds.), Integrative biophysics: Biophotonics (pp. 387–438). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0373-4_12
- Popp, F. A., Gurwitsch, A. A., Inaba, H., Slawinski, J., Cilento, G., van Wijk, R., Chwirot, W. B., & Nagl, W. (1988). Biophoton emission (multi-author review). Experientia, 44(7), 543–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01953305
- Popp, F. A., Nagl, W., Li, K. H., Scholz, W., Weingärtner, O., & Wolf, R. (1984). Biophoton emission: New evidence for coherence and DNA as source. Cell Biophysics, 6(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02788579
- Pospíšil, P., Prasad, A., & Rác, M. (2014). Role of reactive oxygen species in ultra-weak photon emission in biological systems. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 139, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.02.002
- Rahnama, M., Tuszynski, J. A., Bókkon, I., Cifra, M., Sardar, P., & Salari, V. (2011). Emission of mitochondrial biophotons and their effect on electrical activity of membrane via microtubules. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 10(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219635211002622
- Rattemeyer, M., Popp, F. A., & Nagl, W. (1981). Evidence of photon emission from DNA in living systems. Naturwissenschaften, 68(11), 572–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047470
- Rubik, B. (2002). The biofield hypothesis: Its biophysical basis and role in medicine. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 8(6), 703–717. https://doi.org/10.1089/10755530260511711
- Rubik, B., & Jabs, H. (2017). Effects of intention, energy healing, and mind-body states on biophoton emission. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 13(2), 227–247. https://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/604
- Rubik, B., Muehsam, D., Hammerschlag, R., & Jain, S. (2015). Biofield science and healing: History, terminology, and concepts. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 4(Suppl), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2015.038.suppl
- Salari, V., Rahnama, M., & Tuszynski, J. A. (2015). Plausibility of quantum coherent states in biological systems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 626, 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/626/1/012013
- Salari, V., Valian, H., Bassereh, H., Bókkon, I., & Barkhordari, A. (2015). Ultraweak photon emission in the brain. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 14(3), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219635215300012
- Schneckenburger, H., & König, K. (Eds.). (2012). Biophotons in diagnostics: Progress and perspectives. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23603-0
- Scordino, A., Baran, I., Gulino, M., Ganea, C., Grasso, R., Niggli, H. J., & Musumeci, F. (2014). Ultra-weak delayed luminescence in cancer research: A review of the results by the ARETUSA equipment. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 139, 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.03.027
- Sławiński, J. (1988). Luminescence research and its relation to ultraweak cell radiation. Experientia, 44(7), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01953305
- Sun, Y., Wang, C., & Dai, J. (2010). Biophotons as neural communication signals demonstrated by in situ biophoton autography. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 9(3), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1039/b9pp00125e
- Tang, R., & Dai, J. (2014). Spatiotemporal imaging of glutamate-induced biophotonic activities and transmission in neural circuits. PLOS ONE, 9(1), e85643. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085643
- Tilbury, R. N. (1992). The effect of stress factors on the spontaneous photon emission from microorganisms. Experientia, 48(11–12), 1030–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01947992
- van Wijk, E. P. A., Koch, H., Bosman, S., & van Wijk, R. (2006). Anatomic characterization of human ultra-weak photon emission in practitioners of transcendental meditation and control subjects. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 12(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2006.12.31
- van Wijk, R., & van Wijk, E. P. A. (2005). An introduction to human biophoton emission. Forschende Komplementärmedizin und Klassische Naturheilkunde, 12(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1159/000083763
- van Wijk, R., van Wijk, E. P. A., & Bosman, S. (2010). Effect of meditation on ultraweak photon emission from hands and forehead. Forschende Komplementärmedizin, 12(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1159/000084028
- Volodyaev, I. V., & Beloussov, L. V. (2015). Revisiting the mitogenetic effect of ultra-weak photon emission. Frontiers in Physiology, 6, 241. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00241
- Yang, M., Pang, J., Liu, J., Liu, Y., Fan, H., & Han, J. (2015). Spectral discrimination between healthy people and cold patients using spontaneous photon emission. Biomedical Optics Express, 6(4), 1331–1339. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.6.001331
Copyrights EFEIA Foundation 2025. All rights reserved.