by adminefeia | Feb 18, 2026 | EHS, EHS Global Census
People respond to artificial electromagnetic fields in very different ways. Some live immersed in wireless technology with no apparent consequences. Others have stripped their environment down to the minimum and still suffer debilitating symptoms. Most approaches to...
by adminefeia | Feb 13, 2026 | EHS, EHS Global Census
We included a section in Survey A that seemed almost secondary, but responded to something crucial: do you have sensitivities to things other than artificial electromagnetic fields? 76% said yes. This wasn’t a minor finding buried in the demographics. It turned...
by adminefeia | Feb 10, 2026 | EHS, EHS Global Census
We almost missed this finding. When you run a survey study, incomplete responses are typically treated as a methodological inconvenience. You note the completion rate, acknowledge it as a limitation, and proceed with analysis on whoever finished. The incomplete data...
by adminefeia | Feb 5, 2026 | EHS, EHS Global Census, Sleep
Most people assume the relationship between EMF exposure and symptoms is straightforward: more exposure, worse symptoms. Reduce exposure, symptoms improve. It’s a logical model, and it’s not wrong. But our data revealed something more nuanced, something...
by adminefeia | Feb 3, 2026 | Biological Effects, EHS, EHS Global Census
For years, electromagnetic hypersensitivity research has faced a fundamental problem. Studies tend to be small, often under 50 participants, with methodologies that vary wildly and assessment tools that aren’t standardized. Geographic scope is usually limited to...
